About 18 months ago a bit of a fiasco had ensued here in Murfreesboro, TN, over the approval to build a mega-mosque in the midst of the community.  Residents had largely been upset over the size and scope of the mosque and the fact that there was little to no notice of meetings that led to its approval.  That ‘little to no notice’ almost seemed intentional as residents noted that it was hardly the normal procedure.  Any other property of that scope would have had much more time for residents to voice their concerns.  This happens all the time, all over the US be it a  church, a WalMart, Target or any other big box store.  If the residents of the neighborhood don’t want something to be a part of their neighborhood, they will typically rise up against it.  Up until this point (for my relatively short time in the town), this had happened at least 3 times, that I could immediately recall, and I’m sure several times since.

Seemingly out of nowhere a man by the name of Eric Allen Bell shows up and is causing quite a bit of a stir.  There were many of us who thought he may have been some sort of agent-provocateur being used to stir the pot and get a documentary movie out of the deal.  Whether or not this was indeed the case, I don’t know, but he was successful at stirring the pot and getting any voice of the opposition that could be used in a way to make the town look ridiculous the publicity he wanted.  He was able (with the help of the local media) to paint Murfreesboro as some sort of religiously bigoted town with the local residents opposed to anything but some sort of fringe evangelical Christianity.  Of course, such a picture is ridiculous to anyone who actually lives here but that didn’t matter since the truth was a lot harder to get on the front page of the daily paper.

At one point I had landed in a few comment threads and proceeded to engage Eric in order to determine where he stood and if he could back up what he supposedly believed.  The discussion that took place was a a trail of talking points that did nothing but evoke emotion.  The constant asserting method he used proved he hadn’t really thought about the issue nor did he care to.  In the end, I deemed the viewpoint of Eric to be hypocritical, intolerant and religiously bigoted – the very terms he and most of the crowd he had gathered were so eager to throw around.  I decided to post those discussions along with my comments on this site.  Since the opposition couldn’t get a proper voice in the matter, I figured I could at least demonstrate that we had one.

Soon enough, Eric had left town, just as quickly has he had showed up.  All the sites that he had going were given pointers to his main site.  Obviously he had what he needed and everything began to calm down regarding the ICM and their proposed mosque.

Then last week, almost out of the blue, an article shows up on the David Horowitz site titled ‘The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam’.  What then follows is an incredible tale of what took place here in Murfreesboro through the eyes of Eric Allen Bell having somewhat recently changed his position entirely. After reading it I immediately recalled the discussion that I had had with him and the posts I had created regarding them.  When I moved this site to a new host, I let the previous site go without backup.  The only posts that existed were the ones regarding the discussion with Eric Bell and I felt they had run their course.  With the new article he had written I thought it might be worthwhile to look at them again.  I am only linking to the web archive for those posts, rather than recreating them here.  My intention for doing so is not to demean Eric by any means, I simply want to demonstrate what a change of heart he has seemed to have – it is a far cry from what we were hearing a year and a half ago and one that has come with a price as he notes quite well in the article.

 

Richard Dawkins redefined what it means to be a Christian via some survey results taken by his Richard Dawkins Foundation (never mind the fact that the Bible has been telling us the answer for the last 2,000 years… 3,500 for the really keen).  Rev. Giles Fraser then took issue with some of Dawkins’ conclusions in a radio interview.  What ensues is a rather comical exchange where Rev. Fraser turns the tables on Dawkins.

If Richard Dawkins imagines that Christians are Christian by means of knowing the first book of the New Testament (or any of the other questions on the survey) then he would be wise to read at least a handful of actual passages of the Bible.  Granted it is a sad state for professing Christians in the developed world to be in, but it has nothing to do with whether or not they actually believe Jesus to be the Son of God who died as a ransom for their sins.

What makes the exchange comical isn’t that fact that Dawkins doesn’t know the subtitle to Darwin’s On The Origin Of Species.  It’s that he just finished telling Fraser he does and Fraser calls him on it.  Dawkins turns into a sloppy mess in a matter of a couple seconds.

Anyone taking Dawkins with any sort of sincerity should probably rethink their position.  Over the last year, in particular, the man has seemingly been on a quest to demonstrate just how intellectually naive he really is.  Audio of the exchange is here.

Written on February 16th, 2012 , Atheism Tags: , , ,

I’ve thought off and on over the last few weeks what the inaugural post for my redone home on the web should be but nothing has seemed fitting.  The typical post would be one that gives some sort of history of the site along with a vision of what I might hope it becomes, but I don’t know why anyone would care enough to read that – the history is uneventful and dry and as far as my ideas of where to take this site, I’m just not sure they’re well developed enough to warrant a discussion. It hit me this evening, however, as I was finishing up my first tin of G.L. Pease Westminster: Westminster is the inaugural post.

Smoking the last bowl of this tin was somewhat bittersweet.  I was enjoying it outside in the chilly winter air with a little bit of daylight left, grey skies and the streets had just a touch of fog.  Westminster has a warming character about it that’s hard to describe.  I’ve thoroughly enjoyed the last ounce or so as it’s cooled off this season more and more.  The flavors, aroma and the body of the smoke is comforting this time of year.  I’ve enjoyed this blend in four pipes: my Ben Wade freehand, an old Meerschaum, a black-walnut nosewarmer made by a friend of mine (Jonathan Sullivan) and most recently my Neerup Classic.  My favorites for Westminster are the nosewarmer and Neerup.  The Neerup was partially broken in with 4 half-bowls from this tin and as it’s been dedicated to English blends it really seems to allow Westminster to shine.

Westminster was my first tin of pipe tobacco.  Prior to the purchase I had really only smoked a few McClelland bulk blends and a few house blends carried by The Humidor.  As a novice pipe-smoker I really had no idea what I was getting myself into.  I knew I liked the English blends most thus far and after reading the post by Greg (linked above) it only seemed fitting to give it a try.

This blend has never left me disappointed.  It’s delicious from appearance to finish.  The tin aroma is smoky and woodsy, best described as a campfire and the charlight really brings that out even more, particularly since the flavor is much like you’d expect from the aroma.  Once the bowl is lit the flavors continue to keep your interest all the way through to the end.

I’ve enjoyed Westminster from the moment I first opened the tin but it wasn’t until I was about half-way through it that I realized more of the distinct flavors I was tasting and that was due to receiving a gift of Dunhill Elizabethan Mixture.  Since that was really my introduction to Virginia blends it refined my palate a bit to identify more of what I was experiencing in the smoke.  I remember the first time I had a bowl of Westminster after I had a few bowls of Elizabethan Mixture and being immediately taken by surprise by the similarities that were coming in and out of the bowl.  After that, Westminster has seemed even more complex, more interesting and more enjoyable.

Westminster has earned a place in my regular rotation.  I really can’t say enough to do it justice.  While it may be somewhat sentimental due to the fact that it played such an introduction to this hobby for me, I’ve had numerous blends since and all in all, Westminster is still at the top of my list – in fact, it’s only grown on me.  So it’s perfectly fitting that this inaugural post be about my inaugural tin – the first tin of what I hope to be many.  And while I’ll likely never be able to try that infamous Dunhill London Mixture of yesteryear, I have a feeling Westminster may end up being for me what that blend was for Greg and obviously many, many others.

Written on January 21st, 2012 , Tobacco Reviews Tags: , , , ,

davidchristopher.net is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

davidchristopher.net

Christian Theology, Philosophy, Apologetics and Pipe Smoking